Compare the Top Accredited Fiscal Representatives Side by Side in 2026
A like for like grid of the firms most often shortlisted by non-resident sellers, with the same five questions answered for each one.
Why a side by side grid, and not a winner
The honest answer to "who is the best fiscal representative in France" is "the one whose scope, fee model and turnaround fit your specific sale". A €180,000 studio in Brest with two heirs in Canada and a €3.4M villa in Saint-Tropez sold by a Monaco resident need very different firms, even though both files require an accredited representative under Article 244 bis A. So instead of crowning a winner, I keep this grid up to date for the three firms I see most often on the shortlist of readers who write in. Same five questions, same format, no marketing copy from the firms themselves.
The three firms below are paying for placement in the Top 3 block across the site. Their inclusion here is not editorial reward; it is the same paid slot, just transparently labelled. The trade I make for that revenue is simple: the questions are mine, the answers are checked, and a firm that misrepresents its scope is removed before its mandate is up for renewal.
The grid (2026)
| Question | FiscaRep Europe Featured | Accrediteo Paris Featured | Riviera Tax Mandate Featured |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fee model | Flat fee from €1,200 | 0.4% to 0.7% of sale price | Hybrid: €900 base plus 0.3% above €1M |
| Accreditation scope | Real-estate CGT and VAT | Real-estate CGT only | Real-estate CGT only |
| Working languages | EN, FR, DE | EN, FR, IT | EN, FR, RU |
| Funds retention | No funds retained beyond the tax owed | 10% capped retention until tax clearance | No retention up to €2M, 5% above |
| Turnaround | 5 working days from full file | 7 to 10 working days | 5 to 8 working days |
| Best for | Sellers above €300,000 who want a predictable, capped fee | SCI share sales and inherited Paris files | High-value Riviera and Alps sales |
| Action | Get a quote | Get a quote | Get a quote |
Paid placement. How our ranking works. The full list of firms we have verified, paying or not, is in the directory.
What each fee model costs on a real sale
Same sale price, three fee models, three very different invoices. The chart below uses a €600,000 net sale price (above the €150,000 threshold, no exemption), which is roughly the median ticket size of files I see come through.
View data as table
| Firm | Indicative invoice |
|---|---|
| FiscaRep Europe (flat) | €1,200 |
| Accrediteo Paris (0.55% of sale) | €3,300 |
| Riviera Tax Mandate (hybrid base, no % under €1M) | €900 |
Worked example: choosing on a €1.6M Cannes sale
A reader living in Singapore sells a Cannes apartment for €1,600,000, holding period 11 years, gain of €420,000. CGT (19%) plus social charges at 17.2% bring the tax bill to roughly €152,000 before tapers. The representative's job here is to review the file, sign the engagement, and accept joint liability with the seller for that €152,000.
Run the three fee models: FiscaRep flat at €1,200; Accrediteo at 0.55% of €1.6M, so €8,800; Riviera at €900 base plus 0.3% on the slice above €1M, so €900 plus €1,800, totalling €2,700. The flat fee wins on price, but Riviera holds an English language file template ready and a notarial relationship in the Alpes-Maritimes that shaves three days off completion. On a sale this size, those three days can be the difference between catching a buyer's wire or losing the deal. Pick the best fit for the file, not the cheapest line item.
The pitfall to avoid
A percentage of sale fee on a low-gain sale is brutal. If you sell at €900,000 a property bought ten years ago for €870,000 (modest gain of €30,000, after taper and works), a 0.6% fee is €5,400 on a tax bill that may end up close to zero. Always cross-check the fee model against the gain, not just the sale price; ask for a flat fee quote in parallel; and refuse retentions that are not justified by the actual tax exposure on your file.
Pro tip: ask for the engagement letter before the quote
Quotes are easy. The engagement letter (lettre de mission) is where the firm has to commit, in writing, to scope, retention rules, what triggers an extra fee, and what the firm undertakes to do if the tax authority opens a file post-completion. A firm that hesitates to send the engagement letter at the quote stage is a firm whose scope is more flexible than the quote suggests. I have never regretted asking for it; I have regretted not asking.
Key takeaways
- Three firms on this grid pay for placement; the questions and the answers are mine.
- Compare on fee model, scope, retention, turnaround, language, not on a single price tag.
- A flat fee usually beats a percentage above €400,000 sale price; hybrids often beat both above €1M.
- Always read the engagement letter before signing, never just the quote.
- The full list of accredited firms (paid and unpaid) is on the directory.